|
Theory and Professional Practice PROF 191 (secondary) Action Inquiry Assignment Fall Term 2000 Materials originally prepared by Malcolm Welch and adapted in 2000 by the team teaching PROF191 |
Most worthwhile changes in teaching and learning originate in the classroom.
Table of Contents
Action Inquiry: Who? Why? How? So what?
Action Research on the World Wide Web
The following people area acknowledged for their generous contributions to the development of this material:
Clive Beck, Ontario Institute for Studies
in Education
John Freeman, Faculty of Education, Queen's University
Doug Hamilton, York Region Board of Education
Clare Kosnik, Ontario Institute for Studies in Education
Sylvia Pantaleo, Faculty of Education, Queen's University
Tom Russell, Faculty of Education, Queen's University
Lyn Shulha, Faculty of Education, Queen's University
Rena Upitis, Faculty of Education, Queen's University
Mandy Orchard for the cover artwork
Tom
Russell
Queen's University, Faculty of Education
ACTION INQUIRY, or action research, is a term broadly used to describe professionals studying their own practice in order to improve it. Applied to teaching, it involves gathering and interpreting "data" to better understand an aspect of your teaching that interests or concerns you. Action inquiry, as we like to call it, is an important recent development in the broad territory of "teachers' professional development." Action inquiry offers an alternative to teachers who have been encouraged to look to others, rather than to themselves and their students, for ways to improve their teaching.
WHY IS IT SOMETIMES CALLED "RESEARCH"? Try to avoid your everyday assumptions about "research" as you think about action research. Focus instead on the action part of the term. Action research has nothing to do with lab coats, number-crunching, and stereotypes about "objectivity." The term "research" simply refers to trying to better understand what you are doing in your classroom. Who does action research? As the OPSTF publication "Act, Reflect, Revise: Revitalize!" indicates, action research is done by teachers who are encouraged and supported in the study of their own teaching. Action research has a long tradition in parts of England and Australia, and there is a journal called Educational Action Research. Since 1990, there has been a growing interest in Canada and the U.S. in teacher research and action research. In the context of preservice teacher education, we will speak of Action Inquiry to focus on the personal nature of this approach to better understanding ones own teaching, while learning to teach.
WHY DO TEACHERS DO ACTION RESEARCH? As you might expect, much action research is carried out by teachers taking programs of graduate study in education. The support of action research by OPSTF is a significant signal that action research does not need to be limited to graduate work. The "climate" of individual schools is crucial to creating an environment that supports action research.
HOW DO I DO ACTION INQUIRY? Like so many things, the process of action inquiry is deceptively simple on paper. The central question is "How can I help my students improve the quality of their learning?" This can be broken down into these four steps:
1. What is my concern in my practice?
2. What am I going to do about it?
3. What evidence will let me make a judgment about what I did?
4. How will I validate any claims about what I have done?
You and Your Action Research Project (Routledge, 1996) is a recent addition to the small but growing list of resources for action inquiry. Jean McNiff, Pam Lomax and Jack Whitehead wrote this book as an introduction that provides specific directions but also goes beyond to ask broader questions. Their book describes four important points about action research (p. 37):
Notice the frequent use of the word "I" in that list of central ideas. That should help you see that action research is a long way from any idea of research that might imply "distance" or "neutrality." Action inquiry happens "in the swamp" where we live our day-to-day successes, frustrations, disappointments, and occasional miracles. This list of central ideas should include an additional understanding that action inquiry is something you do with, not "on," the students you teach.
HOW LONG DOES AN ACTION INQUIRY PROJECT TAKE? Typically, an action inquiry project will take place over several weeks or months of your practice. The length of time needed to observe or demonstrate improvement will depend upon the target of your action inquiry
WHERE DO I START? "What is my concern in my practice?" is where you begin. It should be a concern that YOU can do something about. It should not depend on others. Notice that the word "concern" calls attention to personal values, and you should select some aspect of your teaching that relates to what is important to you about your students' learning. It would be very helpful to discuss your concern with fellow educators in your school, to let them help you focus your concern, and to let their concerns help you find yours. If two or more people have similar concerns, so much the better!
WHAT DO I DO NEXT? Once you find a focus, the next question is "What am I going to do about it?" Ask yourself if there is some relatively modest change you could introduce to your students that would help you help them improve the quality of their learning. "Quality" is a wonderful word because it is so broad - learning has so many different qualities - yet it also points in the direction of improvement. Parents, teachers and students all prefer high quality over low.
You will need to know more before you DO something. You must investigate what others say about your concern and suggestions they may have on alternative approaches. Talk with your students to get a sense of how they see the quality of their learning. Consult with fellow educators and, most importantly, examine the professional literature on teaching and learning.
HOW DO I FIND OUT IF I MADE A DIFFERENCE? The next question is, "What evidence will let me make a judgment about what I did?" It could be evidence written by students for you, or it could be some improvement in their written work or in the classroom environment. This is where action inquiry starts to pay off, because it makes us look at our teaching through something other than the relatively soft and friendly eyes of our own memories.
SO WHAT? The final question is, "How will I validate any claims about what I have done?" And the answer has several steps: You prepare a written report, no matter how short, that summarizes your concern, your action, your evidence and your interpretation of the evidence. Then you meet with other teachers to invite them to comment on your report, to offer suggestions for going further and to offer additional interpretations of your evidence. This is perhaps the most challenging step, but you can see how this kind of conversation in schools could begin to improve our "self-help" efforts in the field of education.
How can I help my students improve the quality of their learning?
The assignment contains six steps. Pages 4 - 5 provide an overview of the process and a short description of each step. Pages 6 - 20 describe each of these steps in detail. For each step there is a general description of what is required, ideas for beginning the step, what you must submit to your PROF191 instructor, and the due date. For some steps there is also a worksheet to help you complete the task. Suggested readings are listed at the end of each step.
Your instructor will be describing what she or he requires as a submission for each step as well as when work is due. Although all teacher candidates in Prof 191 receive the same assignment booklet, the specific requirements to complete the steps will vary from one instructor to another. As with all good teaching, the approach of the instructor will reflect his or her history and philosophy of teaching as well as the needs of the particular class he or she is teaching. However, all instructors will be grading a final written project due January 28, 2000, as specified later in this booklet.
Step 1. Where do you start? Focusing your inquiry
Begin by asking the question "What is a concern in my practice?" Identify a concern that YOU can do something about, in relation to the quality of student learning. Notice that the word "concern" calls attention to personal values, and you should select some aspect of your teaching that relates to what is important to you about your students' learning. Your action inquiry project MUST have direct relevance to your teaching.
Step 2. Formulating a question (identifying a topic)
Once you have identified an area of concern you must phrase the issue as a question that will form the basis for your action inquiry. Part of the challenge lies in constructing a "researchable" question that you believe has significance and substance. This question will help you determine what data will be collected and how you will collect it.
Step 3. Review of literature and resources related to your question
Read relevant literature (books, journals, articles, reports) in order to identify some of the central authors and issues related to your topic. Outline some of the relevant literature. Bring together your classroom experience and theoretical knowledge of the topic.
Step 4a. Collecting relevant data
Describe suitable strategies for obtaining the data you need to respond to your question. Then decide how and when you will collect the data. Consider (a) the data that describe existing practice, (b) the design and delivery of your new classroom practice, and (c) the data from the altered practice.
Step 4b. Ethical issues
All research/inquiry involving human participants requires consideration of ethical issues. The crucial question is "How can your inquiry be conducted without compromising the integrity, autonomy and dignity of the students in the class where you are studying your own practices?"
Step 5. Analyzing and interpreting the data
Analysis and interpretation give meaning to the data and place it into the context of your action inquiry.
Note: Assessment for steps 1-5 will be formative only. Your instuctor will explain what he or she requires and will make suggestions for improvements to be incorporated into the final report. A mark will only be assigned for the work submitted in step 6a.
Step 6. Reporting results
Reporting the results of your action inquiry has three components.
(a) Written report Your written report should include the question, a description of the data collection methods, a summary of the data, and conclusions about improvements in the quality of student learning. The final section of your paper should reflect upon the process of action inquiry, its impact upon your classroom practice, and your views of teaching. Due date: January 28, 2000
(b) Conference during Consolidation Days You will present the results of your action inquiry to a group of peers during Consolidation Week (January 10 - 11, 2000
Suggested reading
McNiff, J. (1998). Action research for professional development: Concise advice for new action researchers. Mississauga, ON: Ontario Public School Teachers' Federation.
Russell, T. (1996). Action inquiry: Who? Why? How? So what? (See pages 2-3 of this document).
Step 1. Where do you start? Focusing your inquiry
Developing a focus provides a foundation for all other aspects of the action inquiry process.
With your associate teacher, class or individual students
Note: It is not appropriate to criticize your associate teacher or their choice of practices. It is appropriate to describe the classroom setting, your role in it, the interests and aptitudes of the students, the nature of the curriculum, and what you see as issues of particular interest to you. Reference to a particular student must be through a pseudonym only.
With the other PROF 191 candidates
Suggested reading
MacAskill, E. (1998). Getting started. In Delong, J., & Wideman, R. (Eds.), Action research: School improvement through research-based professionalism (pp. 16-17). Mississauga, ON: Ontario Public School Teachers' Federation.
Hannay, L. (n.d.). Getting started. In Halsall, N. D., & Hossack, L. A. (Eds.), Act, reflect, revise: Revitalize (pp. 72-74). Mississauga, ON: Ontario Public School Teachers' Federation.
Action Inquiry: Generating Questions from Your Observations
1. In this [music/mathematics/geography/technological education/etc.] program I notice that ... ?
2. Why do some students ... ?
3. I notice that the classroom environment is/has... ?
4. Is it important to ... ?
5. I wonder why ... ?
6. I wonder how ... ?
Step 2. Formulating a question (identifying a topic)
Once you have identified an area of focus, it is necessary to phrase the issue as a question that will provide the focus for your inquiry. Part of the challenge lies in constructing a personal question that you believe has significance and substance. This question will help you determine what data will be collected and how you will collect your data.
With the other PROF 191 candidates
Action Inquiry: Articulating Your Questions
1. What are the questions you would like to explore?
2. What do you already know about the topic?
3. What difficulties are the students experiencing? How do you know?
4. Why is this problem occurring?
5. What modifications to the program or your teaching might help?
6. What are you learning about this topic through discussions with
(a) your associate teacher?
(b) your faculty liaison?
(c) PROF 191 peers?
Step 3. Review of Literature and Resources Related to Your Personal Question
A literature review offers you the opportunity to become familiar with the key concepts related to your area of investigation. It provides the depth of knowledge required to situate your action inquiry assignment in the context of work that has already been completed by other teachers. A critical component of any review is the clarification of operational definitions.
Much of this step will likely be accomplished during the on-campus weeks while you have access to the library. You should explore the literature relevant to your question and classroom experience by:
A Structure for Thinking
One useful approach for exploring and interpreting the literature considers three aspects of a review:
1. Describe the practices and attitudes in your classroom in relation to this topic. Be specific in your description.
2. Outline some changes you would like to implement in your classroom.
3. Discuss the theoretical issues related to your question, identify some of the central authors and their work in the field, and outline some of the relevant literature.
Step 4a. Collecting relevant data
Once you have established a focus and identified a question, you must decide upon suitable methods for data collection. You will collect two sets of data. First, you will collect data that allows you to begin answering the question you posed in Step 2. Second, you will collect data to determine the effect of your changed practice.
The first data set will:
Consider the following questions:
The worksheet "Action Inquiry: Drafting Your Plan" is designed to help you with decisions about collecting data.
The worksheet "Action Inquiry: Planning Guide" can help you organize your data collection.
Data collection strategies
|
Journals and diaries |
Narrative descriptions |
|
Group activities |
Personal field notes |
|
Interviews* |
Focus discussion groups |
|
Checklists and inventories |
Portfolios of materials |
|
Student achievement data* |
Questionnaires* |
|
Structured observations |
"Backtalk" Photographs (not of students) |
*
Before you use data collection strategies like these,
be sure to address the issues under the heading Ethical Issues (Step
4b)
The second data set will provide information about the effects of your altered practice. It is likely you will use the same methods to collect both the first and the second sets of data. However, you may need to revise or supplement your original data collection methods.
A Structure for Thinking
To help organize your data and prepare for the analysis, here is a useful approach:
(a) describe the inquiry method used
(b) note data that describe existing practice
(c) list the changes to current practice suggested by the data and the review of literature and resources
(d) collect data that describes the effects of your altered practice.
Suggested reading
McNiff, J. (1991). Action research: Principles and practice. London: Routledge. Chapter 6
McNiff, J., Lomax, P., & Whitehead, J. (1996). You and your action research project. London: Routledge. Chapter 4
Action Inquiry: Drafting Your Plan
1. My personal question is .....
2. Some inquiry methods I can use include .....
3. The method I have chosen is appropriate because .....
4. Potential sources of data are .....
5. I will work with .....
6. I plan to begin collecting data .....
7. I have to remember to .....
Action Inquiry: Planning Guide
1. With my group of students I must remember to .....
2. I must have the following data:
3. The best time during my teaching day to talk to my associate teacher about my inquiry is .....
4. The best time during my teaching week/day to work on my inquiry with
students is .....
5. By [ _________ ] I will have completed .....
6. By [ _________ ] I will have completed ......
Many effective teachers regularly collect information in order to evaluate on an ongoing basis their students' learning, and then modify their teaching practices accordingly. But if any of the findings of this evaluation go outside the classroom (as the results of your action inquiry may) there are ethical issues that must be addressed (Donoahue, Cole, Earl & Hookey, 1998).
Regardless of the degree of formality or the scale of the your inquiry, there are some common principles to which all professional inquiries should ascribe. These principles ensure that information and techniques are not misused, intentionally or unintentionally. More importantly, they ensure that the individuals involved (your students) are not exposed to harm or risk.
Involving students in action inquiry
Given the right opportunity and the appropriate guidance, students can play a powerful role in school-based action inquiry. With some teaching, students can gain valuable experience and develop practical skills as they gather information on their own learning, from other students, or from parents and community members.
Suggested reading
An important discussion of the ethical issues resulting from action inquiry is found in:
Donoahue, Z., Cole, A., Earl, L., & Hookey, M. (1998). Some research design issues in action research. In Delong, J., & Wideman, R. (Eds.). Action research: School improvement through research-based professionalism (pp. 86-88). Mississauga, ON: Ontario Public School Teachers' Federation.
McNiff, J., Lomax, P., & Whitehead, J. (1996). You and your action research project. London: Routledge. Pages 34-35.
Title of your study: _________________________________________________________
I HAVE READ AND UNDERSTOOD THIS CONSENT FORM AND I AGREE TO ALLOW MY SON/DAUGHTER TO PARTICIPATE IN THE STUDY.
Student's name (PLEASE PRINT): ____________________________
Signature of parent/guardian: ________________________________
Date: ______________ Telephone number: ____________________
I HAVE READ AND UNDERSTOOD THIS CONSENT FORM AND I AGREE TO PARTICIPATE IN THE STUDY.
Signature of student: _____________________________________
Date: ______________________
Telephone number: _________________________
Step 5. Analyzing and interpreting the data
Analysis and interpretation give data meaning and place it specifically in the context of your action inquiry. In this stage it will be necessary to step back and critically analyze the data you've gathered.
Avoiding and reducing bias
Participants in any inquiry have different perspectives and bases of experience. Without proper precautions, misunderstandings about the meaning of questions or the relevance of the data can occur.
Because the main purpose of action inquiry is to act on important findings, you will need to make decisions about the implications for practice of your results. Consider how to report the findings to others, this may help encourage broader actions to occur.
What you must submit
Reporting your action inquiry has two components. A written report and a presentation.
(a) Written report
Note: Candidates must submit two copies of the final report. One will be returned and one will be retained, on behalf of Queen's University, by the course coordinator.
(b) Conference during Consolidation Days You will present the results of your action inquiry to a group of peers during Consolidation Week in January, 2001)
Level Element
of the inquiry Beginning
... Developing
... Advancing
... Focus
of the inquiry Description
of the classroom context and identification of one or more
issues that arise out of observation, with a rationale for
selecting one of the issues as a focus for study. The
identified issues are discussed in relation to the
candidates' own experience and expertise and their
importance to the associate teacher and students. Arguments
for selecting the issue show implications beyond the
immediate problem and connect to broader issues of teaching
and learning in the classroom. The
inuiry question Single
question that is logically connected to the identified issue
and does not have an immediate or obvious answer. Single
question is accompanied by a set of enabling questions that
will serve as a guide for data collection. There
is evidence that the questions arise out of the continuous
collection and analysis of data. Review
of literature and resources related to the inquiry question A
review of related readings and resources that describe what
is currently known about the issue. Operational definitions
of key concepts and terms are provided. Evidence
that the review of readings and resources has informed an
understanding of the scope of the question. Has
identified a gap in the literature or resources and analyzed
the contribution the inquiry can make to teaching and
learning. Collection
of data Description
of steps taken to ensure adequate and accurate data
collection to answer the question. Care has been taken to
protect the anonymity of both teachers and individual
students. Strong
connections are made between the inquiry question and the
adequacy, accuracy and amount of data collected. Arguments
are made to show that the data are sufficiently adequate and
accurate to enable speculation to practices in related
contexts. Analysis
and interpretation of data There
is evidence of a logical relationship between the question,
the data and the findings. There
is evidence of ways in which the raw data were organized and
synthesized to produce the findings. This evidence provides
assurance that the findings are well supported by the data. Analysis
informs the critical reader why the preferred interpretation
has been chosen over other possibilities. New and important
questions are identified for further inquiry. Reporting
of results All
steps of the AR are brought together in a coherent and
academically acceptable form. The conclusion contains
insights into the AR process and its influence on the
author's classroom practice. The
report is written in a style that invites the reader to
experience the breadth and depth of a classroom-based action
inquiry experience. The
report exhibits qualities that make it of sufficient quality
to merit internal academic review that could lead to a
conference presentation or publication.
Grading Policy
A grade of PASS will be awarded when all of the elements of the action inquiry assignment are judged to be at the beginning level or better.
A grade of HONOURS will be awarded when (a) four or more of the steps are judged to be at the developing or advancing level.
Delong, J., & Wideman, R. (Eds.). (1998). Action research: School improvement through research-based professionalism. Mississauga, ON: Ontario Public School Teachers' Federation.
Halsall, N. D., & Hossack, L. A. (n.d.). Act, reflect, revise: Revitalize. Mississauga, ON: Ontario Public School Teachers' Federation.
· J A good place to start if you have no experience with action inquiry.
McNiff, J. (1998). Action research for professional development: Concise advice for new action researchers. Mississauga, ON: Ontario Public School Teachers' Federation.
· J Essential reading.
McNiff, J. (1991). Action research: Principles and practice. London: Routledge.
McNiff, J., Lomax, P., & Whitehead, J. (1996). You and your action research project. London: Routledge.
· J Excellent introduction to action inquiry.
Carson, T. R., & Sumara, D. J. (Eds.). (1997). Action research as a living practice. New York: Peter Lang.
Hollingsworth, S. (Ed.). (1997). International action research: A casebook for educational reform. London: Falmer Press.
Hollingsworth, S., & Sockett, H. (Eds.). (1994). Teacher research and educational reform. Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education.
Lomax, P. (Ed). (1996). Quality management in education: Sustaining the vision through action research. London: Routledge.
McNiff, J. (1993). Teaching as learning: An action research approach. London: Routledge.
McNiff, J., Whitehead, J., & Laidlaw, M. (1992). Creating a good social order through action research. Bournemouth, UK: Hyde Publications.
O'Hanlon, C. (Ed). (1996). Professional development through action research in educational settings. London: Falmer Press.
Russell, T. (1995). Reconstructing educational theory from the authority of personal experience: How can I best help people learn to teach? Studies in Continuing Education, 17(1&2), 6-17.
Russell, T. (1996, January). Learning about teaching from self-study of a university course on action research. RefLecT, 2(1), 40-45.
Whitehead, J. (1993). The growth of educational knowledge. Bournemouth, UK: Hyde Publications.
Zuber-Skerritt, O. (Ed.). (1996). New directions in action research. London: Falmer Press.
Action Inquiry and Action Research on the World Wide Web
Action Research at
Queen's University Action Research at Bath
University (UK) Action Research: A
Brief Overview. Action Research
Electronic Reader WEB Links to
Participatory Action Research Sites Ontario
Educational Research Council Educating as
Inquiry NETWORKS-- Action Research
Resources The Teacher
Inquirer The Ontario Action
Researcher--
A Teacher / Action Research Site
An On-Line Journal for Teacher
Research
(BC Teachers' Federation)
An On-Line Journal for Action
Research, supported by Grand Erie Board of Education,
Nipissing University, and the Elementary Teachers Federation
of Ontario.